Tuesday, October 23, 2012

What I've Learned...


Throughout this short, yet in-depth exploration of historical accounts of vampires I’ve learned that stories are changed by each individual who tells them. Everyone hears and interoperates things differently, and the accounts of what happened in vampire sightings change based on where it comes from and who’s saying it. I have learned to take the incongruities and through them out as they are most likely exaggerations. I went from taking all the facts I could find and believing they were reasonable, to being more skeptical about what details were plausible for that time.

I can’t truly say I’ve found any sort of real answer; however I’ve dug up some interesting stories about real sightings of “vampire” dating back hundreds of years. Cleary these people were scared of something real in existence, but it seems they let their fear only get the best of them. I believe people were just seeing things that they couldn’t understand that we do today. But there are some great accounts that have undeniable similarities throughout Europe, Asia, India and Russia.



I could go on and on about what I would like to find in these historical accounts about the blood sucking monsters. Some of these accounts seriously interest me with their shocking ideas and the reactions these people had to possible vampire cases. I understand that people would shiver toward any clue set my “vampire hunters” of how to identify a vampire, but what I’m still most uncertain of is how exactly people identified possible future vampires and vampires themselves.  Another thing I’d like to know is how long this vampire craze existed and what brought along the demise of their hysteria that lasted hundreds of years.
I’d like to argue that there are more credible accounts of documents cases that exist about vampires that can lead to a plausible explanation for these crazy allegations. 

No comments:

Post a Comment